ArticlePloS one2025
Cultural adaptation of a psychosocial screening tool for adolescents living with HIV/AIDS attending antiretroviral therapy program in Malawi.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdolescents living with HIV (ALHIV) face a higher risk of mental health problems than adolescents without HIV yet culturally appropriate mental health screening tools are lacking in settings like Malawi. This study aimed to culturally adapt the HEADSS (Home, Education, Activities, Drugs, Sexuality, Suicide/Depression) psychosocial screening tool for the Malawian context, as the original was previously found to be inappropriate.
methodsThe study was conducted between December 2021 and May 2022. We employed an adapted Heuristic Framework for cultural adaptation translations. Data was collected with Mental Health experts (n = 4), focus group discussions with ALHIV (n = 20), in-depth interviews with health care providers (HCPs) (n = 6) and key informants (n = 4). An iterative process of piloting and feedback guided the adaptation.
resultsThe adaptation addressed conceptually difficult, unacceptable, or stigmatizing items. HCPs reported that the adapted HEADSS tool may effectively guide the examination of ALHIV challenges and simplify the identification of high-risk behaviors (e.g., early sexual debut, self-harm and substance abuse). The tool's language was culturally accepted by ALHIV, as the screening questions were available in both the local language and English, and accurately reflected their daily challenges.
conclusionsDeveloping easy-to-use, comprehensible, and locally appropriate mental health screening tools is crucial for detecting high-risk behaviors and psychosocial issues among ALHIV. To effectively meet ALHIVs' needs within HIV services, mental health interventions are essential for improving adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART). Therefore, training HCPs to address sensitive risk issues during routine care is highly recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.