ArticlePloS one2025
Fast machine learning image reconstruction of radially undersampled k-space data for low-latency real-time MRI.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Training Deep Learning Based Dynamic MR Image Reconstruction Using Synthetic Fractals.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fast data acquisition and fast image reconstruction are essential to enable low-latency real-time magnetic resonance (MR) imaging applications with high temporal resolution such as interstitial percutaneous needle interventions or MR-guided radiotherapy. To accelerate the image reconstruction of radially undersampled 2D k-space data, we propose a machine learning (ML) model that consists of a single fully connected linear layer to interpolate radial k-space data to a Cartesian grid, followed by a conventional 2D inverse fast Fourier transform. This k-space-to-image ML model was trained on synthetic data from natural images. It was evaluated with respect to image quality (mean squared error (MSE) compared to ground truth where available) and reconstruction time both on synthetic data with undersampling factors R between 2 and 10 as well as on radial k-space data from MR measurements on two different MRI systems. For comparison, conventional non-iterative zero-filling non-uniform fast Fourier transform (NUFFT) reconstruction and compressed sensing (CS) reconstruction were used. On synthetic data, the ML model achieved better median MSE values than the non-iterative NUFFT reconstruction. The interquartile ranges of the MSE distributions overlapped for the ML and CS reconstructions for all R. Reconstruction times of the ML approach were shorter than for NUFFT and substantially shorter than for CS reconstructions. The generalizability (for real MRI data) of the ML model was demonstrated by reconstructing 0.35-tesla MR-Linac dynamic measurements of three volunteers and phantom data from a diagnostic 1.5-tesla MRI system; the median reconstruction time for the coil-combined images was much shorter than for the conventional approach (ML: [Formula: see text]; NUFFT: [Formula: see text]). The proposed ML model reconstructs MR data with reduced streaking artifacts compared to non-iterative NUFFT techniques and with extremely short reconstruction times; thus, it is ideally suited for rapid low-latency real-time MR applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.