ArticlePloS one2025
A database of words and pictures for investigating phonological-semantic processing and interaction in language processing: Validation and application.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An increasing number of studies aim to directly compare aspects of linguistic processing in word production and comprehension using controlled experiments with shared stimuli across modalities. However, the available resources allowing for such investigations are scarce, particularly for languages other than English. To address this gap, we present an open-source database of 151 German words and related picture stimuli. The items are drawn from two well-investigated semantic categories - animals and tools - and differ phonologically by either starting with a labial or a coronal speech sound. The database includes human ratings for depictive accuracy, familiarity, action relatedness, valence, arousal of the pictures, and familiarity, action relatedness, valence, arousal, and imageability of the words. In a set of analyses, we show that the ratings we collected have good reliability and external validity, and align well with previously obtained data from lexical and pictorial databases. The database is complemented with comprehensive information about phonetic/phonological, lexical, morphological, and semantic properties of the words, as well as about luminosity and visual complexity of the corresponding pictures. We finally present a matched stimulus set obtained from the database, as a ready-to-use resource for psycho- and neurolinguistic studies examining semantic and phonological processing along with their interaction in language production and comprehension. The word-picture database, together with the matched stimulus set, are freely available at https://osf.io/k64nh/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.