Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41248111›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Evaluation of a commercial pressure cooker for the preparation of agar media for a diagnostic microbiology laboratory.

Joseph E Rubin, Florence Huby, Roshan P Madalagama, Shyamali de Alwis, Melinda Wyshynski, Rasika Jinadasa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joseph E RubinDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2636-406X
Florence HubyDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Roshan P MadalagamaDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6118-0100
Shyamali de AlwisDivision of Bacteriology, Veterinary Research Institute, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
Melinda WyshynskiDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Rasika JinadasaDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to prepare sterilized media is a critical capability of any microbiology lab. Diagnostic labs in low-resource settings, which lack autoclave facilities, are therefore severely limited in their ability to perform basic assays such as bacterial culture or biochemical tests. This investigation aimed to validate the use of a commercially available pressure cooker as an autoclave substitute to produce agar plates. First, a Geobacillus stearothermophilus biological indicator was used to confirm adequate sterilization. Next, the colony morphology of several important bacterial species were compared on MacConkey and 5% sheep's blood agar plates prepared using the pressure cooker with those made in an autoclave. Finally, disc diffusion susceptibility testing was performed to determine whether the sterilization method impacts the inhibitory zone diameters. Overall, the morphology of colonies was similar on media prepared in both ways; key phenotypic characteristics (lactose fermentation, colour, shape, hemolysis and smell) were the same. Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion test results were nearly identical. These findings indicate that a commercially available pressure cooker may be suitable to prepare media in low-resource laboratories.

Indexed as

AgarBacteriological TechniquesCulture MediaSterilizationGeobacillus stearothermophilusPressureAgarCulture Media

Identifiers

PMID41248111
PMCPMC12622842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.