Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41248066›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Enhancing museum collection images with fuzzy set guided convolutional neural network: A novel approach leveraging fuzzy set theory.

Manqi Li, Lili Ren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Manqi LiSchool of Fine Arts and Design, Heze University, Heze, Shandong, China.
Lili RenSolux School of Architecture and Design, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5732-1057

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Museum collection images are invaluable for preserving cultural heritage and studying history. However, these images often lack quality and clarity. This study introduces a novel museum collection image enhancement technique based on fuzzy set theory. The proposed approach comprehensively addresses the complexity and uniqueness of museum collection images to improve their quality significantly. The methodology steps start with preprocessing and graying out the images, eliminating noise through segmentation and smoothing processes. A convolutional neural network (CNN) is utilized to extract image features and apply adaptive histogram equalization for enhancement. A distinctive aspect of our method is transforming image grayscale levels into fuzzy sets. We analyze the similarity between the fuzzy sets before and after enhancement using the cosine similarity algorithm, allowing us to reconstruct the processed images with targeted similarity. Testing our approach on 100 museum collection images, we found that the average contrast of the collection images improved significantly. Specifically, the average contrast for our fuzzy set-based enhancement was 0.91, compared to 0.81 and 0.79 for histogram equalization and wavelet transform methods, respectively. Our research showcases a museum collection image enhancement technology based on fuzzy set theory that effectively enhances image fidelity and clarity, improving the overall quality of museum collection images. Our work underscores the importance of ongoing research in this area to unlock the full potential of museum collection image enhancement technology.

Indexed as

Fuzzy LogicImage EnhancementImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMuseumsNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksHumans

Identifiers

PMID41248066
PMCPMC12622820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.