Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41248055›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Validation of the German version of the meaning in life measure.

Albert Anoschin, Johannes Zimmermann, Carina Remmers

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Albert AnoschinDepartment of Psychology, Institute for Mental Health and Behavioral Medicine, HMU Health and Medical University Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9315-1224
Johannes ZimmermannDepartment of Psychology, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6975-2356
Carina RemmersDepartment of Psychology, Institute for Mental Health and Behavioral Medicine, HMU Health and Medical University Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite growing interest in meaning in life as a core construct of eudaimonic well-being, there is a lack of brief and validated self-report scales in the German language. We translated the Meaning in Life Measure (MILM) to German and examined its psychometric properties in two studies. The MILM is an 8-item self-report instrument that assesses the experience of meaning in life (MILM-E) and reflectivity about meaning in life (MILM-R) with two subscales. In Study 1 (N = 1,189), we confirmed that the German MILM-E and MILM-R load on two positively correlated latent factors, replicating the two-factor structure of the original English measure. In Study 2 we conducted a follow-up assessment (N = 300) nine months later, again confirming the fit of the two-factor structure. Additionally, we examined the nomological network of the MILM by relating both subscales to well-being, self-efficacy, satisfaction with life, preference for intuition and deliberation, rumination, and religiosity/spirituality. All hypotheses regarding the direction of associations were pre-registered. As expected, the MILM-E demonstrated strong correlations with concurrent meaning in life measures (r > .60) and substantial positive correlations with well-being indicators. The MILM-R correlated positively with search for meaning and rumination but, contrary to our expectations, was not significantly associated with well-being measures. Test-retest correlations over nine months indicated a high temporal rank-order stability of both subscales (MILM-E: r = .64; MILM-R: r = .59).

Indexed as

PsychometricsQuality of LifeAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleGermanyHumansLanguageMaleMiddle AgedPersonal SatisfactionSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41248055
PMCPMC12622772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.