ArticleIEEE transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics
Decentralized Reinforcement Learning for Asymmetric Gene Network Interventions.
Article in IEEE transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in drug discovery from advanced molecular representation to pipeline applications.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) regulate essential cellular functions, and their dysregulation contributes to diseases such as cancer and autoimmune disorders. Designing effective interventions is challenging due to (i) the adaptive resistance of cells to therapies and (ii) the limited knowledge of genes' states during the intervention process through gene expression data. To address these challenges, this paper develops a decentralized deep reinforcement learning framework for intervention in GRNs. The intervention process is formulated as an asymmetric two-player zero-sum game, where the history-dependent intervention policy is derived against a cell that has complete knowledge of gene states. The optimal intervention policy is expressed as a Nash equilibrium policy, and a deep policy gradient approach is developed to approximate this policy. The analytical results demonstrate that under non-aggressive cell responses, the proposed intervention policy achieves higher-than-expected gains, ensuring robustness even against the most complex adaptive cellular responses. Furthermore, if the true system state becomes fully observable, the proposed method converges to the full-state Nash equilibrium. Numerical experiments on two benchmark GRN models, p53-MDM2 and melanoma regulatory networks, validate the proposed method, demonstrating its superior adaptability under uncertainty compared to state-of-the-art intervention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.