Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41247730›Full record

Observational studyJAMA network open2025

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Cesarean Birth Trends in the United States.

Marie J Boller, Bharti Garg, Hailey A Baker, Maria I Rodriguez, Nicole E Marshall, Aaron B Caughey

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marie J BollerDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Bharti GargDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Hailey A BakerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis.
Maria I RodriguezDivision of Complex Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Nicole E MarshallDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Aaron B CaugheyDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Inequity by race and ethnicity persists in obstetric practice. A comprehensive comparison of the rates of cesarean birth by race and ethnicity in the United States is essential to target quality improvement efforts. Objective: To evaluate the trends in national cesarean birth rates stratified by race and ethnicity as well as parity from 2012 to 2021 and to describe any racial and ethnic disparities. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective observational cohort study of birth data from the National Vital Statistics System. Inclusion criteria were singleton, nonanomalous, full-term gestation (37 weeks and 0 days to 42 weeks and 0 days) births with vertex presentation. Trends in the proportions of cesarean births from 2012 to 2021 among nulliparous individuals, multiparous individuals without prior a cesarean birth, and multiparous individals with prior a cesarean birth were graphically examined. Data were analyzed from March 27, 2024, to July 13, 2025. Exposure: Race and ethnicity, self-reported as American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, and non-Hispanic White. Main Outcomes and Measures: Main outcomes were cesarean birth rates among nulliparous individuals and multiparous individuals with or without a prior cesarean birth. Cesarean birth rates among self-reported racial and ethnic groups were compared in 2021 relative to 2012 using risk ratios (RRs). Further, the association of racial and ethnic groups with cesarean deliveries was examined using multivariable Poisson regression analyses adjusting for maternal age, education, insurance, prepregnancy body mass index, diabetes (preexisting and gestational), hypertension (chronic and gestational), birth weight, and gestational age and reported as adjusted RRs (ARRs). Results: In total, 30 014 020 births were included (mean [SD] maternal age, 28.6 [5.8] years). For non-Hispanic Black individuals, the adjusted risk of cesarean birth was higher compared with individuals from other racial and ethnic groups; this disparity increased from 2012 to 2021 (2012 ARR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.11-1.13]; 2021 ARR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.14-1.20]). This finding persisted among nulliparous (2012 ARR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.17-1.24]; 2021 ARR, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.19-1.27]) and multiparous individuals without a prior cesarean birth (2012 ARR, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.20-1.45]; 2021 ARR, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.24-1.43]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of births in the United States from 2012 to 2021, the rate of overall cesarean births decreased slightly over the study period. However, racial and ethnic disparities persisted, with increasing risk of primary cesarean births among non-Hispanic Black individuals compared with individuals from other racial and ethnic groups. Quality improvement efforts to reduce unnecessary cesarean births should address this inequity and the structural racism that drives it.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionEthnicityHealthcare DisparitiesRacial GroupsAdultFemaleHumansParityPregnancyRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41247730
PMCPMC12625682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.