ReviewAnnals of intensive care2025
Use of intravenous lipid emulsions in drug-induced toxicities: a 2025 narrative review.
Review in Annals of intensive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Case Report: Dynamic characteristics of myocardial depression after severe bupivacaine-induced local anesthetic systemic toxicity.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intravenous lipid emulsions (ILE) were first proposed in 1998 as a treatment for bupivacaine-induced cardiac arrest. Since then, their use has expanded to include poisonings by various lipophilic drugs such as tricyclic antidepressants, calcium channel blockers, and antipsychotics. This 2025 narrative review explores the evolving pathophysiological mechanisms of ILE therapy, including the lipid sink and lipid shuttle theories, as well as non-scavenging cardiotonic effects such as membrane stabilization, mitochondrial support, and modulation of vascular tone. It summarizes recent findings from randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, animal models, and case registries. While clinical trials demonstrate potential benefits-particularly in tramadol, clozapine, and organophosphate poisonings-mortality reduction remains unproven, and evidence is limited by study heterogeneity and low methodological quality. Adverse effects, although rare, include acute pancreatitis, interference with laboratory testing, and fat overload syndrome, especially at high infusion volumes. Current guidelines recommend ILEs as a first-line treatment for local anesthetic systemic toxicity and as a second-line option in life-threatening poisonings involving other lipophilic agents. However, significant uncertainty remains regarding optimal indications, dosing strategies, and long-term safety. High-quality, multicenter studies and updated registries are needed to refine these recommendations and clarify the role of ILEs in clinical toxicology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.