Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41247620›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics - open2026

Estimation of Health Utility Values for Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis.

Bhovina Buguth, Jacqui Bernarde, Daniel Aggio, Arya Pimprikar, Michael Watt, Lotte Westerink, Josefine Persson, Andrew Lloyd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics - open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bhovina BuguthMarket Access, AstraZeneca UK, London, UK.
Jacqui BernardeAcaster Lloyd Consulting Ltd., London, UK.
Daniel AggioAcaster Lloyd Consulting Ltd., London, UK.
Arya PimprikarAcaster Lloyd Consulting Ltd., London, UK.
Michael WattMedical and Scientific Affairs, AstraZeneca UK, London, UK.
Lotte WesterinkHealth Economics and Payer Evidence, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Josefine PerssonHealth Economics and Payer Evidence, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Andrew LloydAcaster Lloyd Consulting Ltd., London, UK. Andrew.lloyd@acasterlloyd.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7597-6556

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a rare autoimmune disease, characterised by inflammation of small- to medium-sized blood vessels, however, it remains poorly described in the literature. The purpose of this study was to characterise EGPA health states and to estimate utility weights for each to inform economic evaluations. To achieve this, we aimed to characterise and develop health-state vignettes representing EGPA and to estimate utility values from the United Kingdom (UK) public and individuals from the UK with EGPA.

methodsVignettes were developed using evidence from a literature review and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) data. Qualitative interviews with patients (n = 7), clinicians (n = 4), and one health-related quality of life (HRQoL) expert were conducted to refine the content of the vignettes. To derive utility values, vignettes were assessed using an online survey by members of the UK public (N = 316) and patients with EGPA (N = 20). Participants evaluated each vignette by imagining themselves in the described vignettes and completed the EQ-5D-5L for each vignette.

resultsBased on the literature review and PRO data from a clinical trial and real-world study, four health-state vignettes for EGPA were defined: remission, relapse, non-refractory, and refractory, which clinicians recognised as clinically meaningful. These vignettes captured the physical, psychological, and functional impacts of EGPA across health states. The subsequent survey was completed by 316 members of the UK public, and 20 patients with EGPA. Utility scores for remission (public: 0.675; patients: 0.690) scored highest, followed by non-refractory (public: 0.619; patients: 0.621), relapse (public: 0.453; patients: 0.410), and refractory (public: 0.151; patients: 0.059). EGPA patients' scores were largely consistent with those of the public, except for the refractory state, where patients reported lower scores.

conclusionsThe findings highlight the substantial HRQoL impact of EGPA across all health states, with a higher perceived impact for the relapse and refractory health states. The public and EGPA patient samples produced consistent ratings. This study addresses an evidence gap by characterising health states in EGPA and defining the HRQoL of patients with EGPA across these health states. Multiple evidence sources were integrated to develop these values, which we believe represents a robust approach to estimating health state utilities in a rare disease.

Identifiers

PMID41247620
PMCPMC12796046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.