ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2025
Cannabis in road traffic - a retrospective analysis to identify possible cut-off-values.
Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In light of the recent partial legalization of cannabis in Germany and the associated adjustment of the legal threshold for THC serum concentration from 1 ng/ml to 3.5 ng/ml, we investigated whether a specific THC serum concentration or cannabis influence factor (CIF) value could be identified, above which behavioural and driving impairments significantly increase. We retrospectively analysed cases from 2020 to 2021, in which blood samples had been submitted for toxicological analysis from drivers suspected of operating a vehicle under the influence of cannabis alone (DUIC) or in combination with alcohol (DUIAC). 740 cases were evaluated with respect to behavioural and driving impairments, serum concentration of THC and its metabolites, CIF values, and-in cases involving co-consumption-blood alcohol concentration (BAC). Our findings indicate that cannabis impairs psychomotor and cognitive functions and that THC serum concentrations are roughly correlated with driving impairment. However, we were unable to define a clear cut-off-value above which a significant increase in impairment could be detected. Slightly (but statistically significant) higher THC serum concentrations and CIF values were observed in cases where there was concrete evidence of criminal offenses pursuant to § 316 of the German Penal Code. However, absolute differences were small and there was too much overlap between the two groups to define a useful cut-off-value for THC. There is a measurable relationship between THC serum concentration and impairment. This relationship is too weak to scientifically define a cut-off value. Regarding the revised legal threshold for THC serum concentration, we found that approximately one-third of the evaluated cases would no longer be subject to legal penalties if the new threshold of 3.5 ng/ml were applied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41247612What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.