ArticleBlood research2025
A comparative study of hematologic response to ropeginterferon alfa-2b in hydroxyurea-resistant or intolerant polycythemia vera: a real-world data-based analysis.
Article in Blood research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Molecular Response, Event-Free Survival, and Treatment-Free Remission in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Update and Review with Insights from MPN Asia 2026.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare the hematologic response to ropeginterferon alfa-2b versus available therapies in patients with hydroxyurea-resistant or intolerant polycythemia vera (HU-R/I PV) using propensity-matched real-world data.
methodsThis retrospective propensity-matched cohort study compared a single-arm clinical trial cohort with a historical control cohort from five Korean institutions. We included 36 HU-R/I patients from a prospective phase II trial (PV IIT, registration number KCT0006138) and 81 matched historical controls. Propensity score matching and weighted analyses balanced the baseline characteristics (age, sex, disease duration, hematologic parameters, and HU status). The primary endpoint was a complete hematologic response (CHR) at 48 weeks.
resultsAt 48 weeks, ropeginterferon alfa-2b achieved significantly higher CHR rates (52%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 35-70%) than historical controls (15%; 95% CI: 8-27%; odds ratio 0.15; 95% CI: 0.07-0.33; p < 0.0001). This superiority remained consistent across various matching ratios and weighted analyses. Subgroup analyses showed higher response rates to ropeginterferon alfa-2b, regardless of HU status (resistant vs. intolerant), age (< 60 vs. ≥ 60 years), or disease duration (< 5 vs. ≥ 5 years). In the control group, the most common regimen was a combination of HU and phlebotomy (53%) with limited use of ruxolitinib (5.5%). Analyses confirmed robustness with no significant baseline imbalances after matching.
conclusionRopeginterferon alfa-2b demonstrated superior early hematologic efficacy compared with conventional salvage therapies in Korean patients with HU-R/I PV. Extended follow-up is warranted to assess the long-term clinical benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.