Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41247585›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2025

Surgeons' Perspectives on Insurance Coverage for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery in India: An Obesity and Metabolic Surgery Society of India (OSSI) Survey.

Aparna Govil, Randeep Wadhawan, Manish Khaitan, Surendra Ugale, Abhishek Katakwar, Apoorv Srivastava, Ashish Vashistha, Gurvinder Jammu, Kuldeepak Kular, Manish Baijal and 9 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Aparna GovilSaifee Hospital, Mumbai, India. draparnagovil@gmail.com.
Randeep WadhawanMax Super Speciality Hospital, Delhi, India.
Manish KhaitanKD Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.
Surendra UgaleKirloskar & Virinchi hospitals, Hyderabad, India.
Abhishek KatakwarAsian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.
Apoorv SrivastavaHi-Tech Bariatric & Laparoscopy Surgery Center, Indore, India.
Ashish VashisthaMax Super Speciality Hospital, Delhi, India.
Gurvinder JammuJammu Hospital, Jalandhar, India.
Kuldeepak KularKular Hospitals Pvt. Ltd., Ludhiana, India.
Manish BaijalMax Super Speciality Hospital, Delhi, India.
Manish MotwaniAastha Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Mohammed IsmailMaulana Hospital, Kerala, India.
Pawanindra LalIndraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, India.
Praveen RajGastroenterology Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore, India.
Raj PalaniappanApollo Hospitals, Chennai, India.
Shrihari DhorepatilShree Hospital, Pune, India.
Sumeet ShahPSRI Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Vivek BindalMax Super Speciality Hospital, Delhi, India.
Vikram LotwalaWings Hospital, Surat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is a proven and effective treatment for obesity and its related illnesses. In 2019, the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) mandated that MBS be covered under health insurance policies if specific medical criteria are met. However, real-world implementation of this policy is often inconsistent, with reports of claim denials and delays. This study aimed to assess Indian metabolic and bariatric surgeons' experiences with insurance coverage for metabolic and bariatric surgery.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among 109 members of the Obesity Surgery Society of India (OSSI) using a structured Google Form between November 2024 and March 2025. The questionnaire covered surgeon demographics, insurance experiences, patient patterns, and policy suggestions. Data were collected anonymously and analyzed using descriptive statistics.

resultsWhile 87.2% of respondents observed more patient interest after IRDAI's insurance mandate, only 9.2% reported that most of their patients used insurance. Low awareness, complex paperwork, and high out-of-pocket costs were major problems. 95.4% said patients delay surgery while waiting for insurance approval. The approval process was rated as complex or very complex by 69.7%. High denial rates were reported, often due to obesity exclusions or incomplete documentation. Nearly all respondents supported changes to improve the system, including faster approvals, fewer documentation requirements, and broader eligibility criteria such as lower BMI thresholds and inclusion of type 2 diabetes.

conclusionsDespite regulatory progress, insurance-related challenges like administrative delays, poor patient awareness, and inconsistent claim approvals continue to limit equitable access to MBS in India. Policymakers and insurers need to streamline processes and expand eligibility to ensure more people can benefit from this life-saving treatment.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelBariatric SurgeryInsurance CoverageInsurance, HealthObesitySurgeonsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedSocieties, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesBariatric surgeryHealth insuranceHealth policyObesity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.