ReviewFamilial cancer2025
Hybrid neurofibroma/schwannoma in schwannomatosis-a diagnostically challenging benign peripheral nerve sheath tumour.
Review in Familial cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contemporary Profile of Hybrid Nerve Sheath Tumors: Clinical, Anatomical, and Imaging Characteristics.Cancers · 2026Article
- Foundation artificial intelligence models enable high-accuracy diagnostic differentiation of hybrid neurofibroma/schwannoma using whole-slide images.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- Oral-maxillofacial and cervical schwannomas: a retrospective cohort analysis with a rare intraosseous case.BMC oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hybrid neurofibroma/schwannoma tumors (HNS) represent a still underrecognized, yet clinically and diagnostically significant entity within the spectrum of schwannomatosis (SWN). While classical schwannomas have been well known for decades, HNS have only recently been described as a distinct histological pattern, composed of intermixed features typical of both schwannomas and neurofibromas. Differentiating HNS from pure neurofibroma (Nf) is critical, as misclassification may lead to an incorrect diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type 1 rather than SWN. The distinction of hybrid tumors (more precisely HNS) is especially important in SWN forms outside the neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) spectrum (NF2-SWN), where major diagnostic criteria are less well defined, making histological differentiation even more significant. At the molecular level, HNS frequently show alterations in the genes NF2, LZTR1, and SMARCB1, often accompanied by characteristic losses of chromosome 22q. In addition, recurrent somatic mutations have been identified in genes such as ERBB2, RET, KMT2A, and CTNNA3. Methylation profiling classifies HNS within the schwannoma spectrum, supporting the hypothesis that they may be a morphological variant rather than a distinct entity, although this has not yet been conclusively confirmed. Histologically, HNS are characterized by a combination of mostly schwannoma-associated Antoni A patterns, collagen-rich neurofibroma-like areas, lymphocytic infiltrates, and, in some cases, plexiform growth. Given the diagnostic challenges, artificial intelligence-based image analysis, such as whole-slide imaging and radiomics, may offer valuable tools for more accurate identification of these tumors in the future. Initial studies in related fields have shown that such approaches can even surpass human-level accuracy. Nevertheless, an accurate histological and, if necessary, molecular evaluation remains essential-particularly for the correct classification as SWN and for ensuring appropriate genetic counseling to affected individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.