ReviewPediatric cardiology2025
Efficacy and Tolerability of Selexipag in Pediatric Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Review in Pediatric cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evidence supporting selexipag in pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is sparse, mainly from small, heterogeneous studies. This meta-analysis assessed its efficacy and tolerability in this population. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus was conducted until April 2025. Eligible studies included patients under 18 years diagnosed with PAH and treated with selexipag, reporting clinical outcomes. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted data, and evaluated study quality. Pooled analyses of efficacy and safety outcomes were performed, with subgroup comparisons for add-on therapy versus transition from parenteral prostacyclin analogs. Twelve studies involving 344 pediatric patients (90.6% diagnosed with PAH) were included. Selexipag significantly improved 6-minute walk distance (SMD: - 0.75; 95% CI: - 1.22 to - 0.29; P = 0.002), but did not affect pulmonary vascular resistance index, mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), or NT-proBNP. Sensitivity analysis revealed reduced mPAP in PAH-only studies (SMD: - 0.30; P = 0.03). Adverse events occurred in 62.8%, predominantly mild. Functional improvement was greater in the add-on therapy group, which also experienced more adverse events. Selexipag improved functional capacity and mPAP in pediatric PAH and was generally well tolerated. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm long-term benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41247547What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.