ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Clinical Deterioration in Stage 1 and 2 Single Ventricle Patients Awaiting Heart Transplant: A Single Center Experience.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mortality remains high amongst children with single ventricle (SV) congenital heart disease awaiting heart transplantation, especially in those with Stage 1 (S1) and Stage 2 (S2) physiology. While ventricular assist device (VAD) support has improved overall pediatric waitlist mortality, management of S1 and S2 patients with VAD continues to be challenging often leaving this already sick cohort with inadequate support options while waiting. We describe clinical deterioration of S1 and S2 patients awaiting HT and examine factors associated with clinical deterioration, waitlist mortality and post-transplant survival. This was a retrospective study of all S1 and S2 patients listed for transplant at Lucile Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford University from November 2006 to December 2023. Clinical deterioration was defined as waitlist death or escalation of support (addition of inotropes, intubation, VAD or ECMO) between listing and waitlist removal. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to examine associations with outcomes. 61 patients (29 S1, 32 S2) were included. 58% of the patients had clinical deterioration while on the waitlist. Over a median of 79 (IQR 34-176) waitlist days, 62% were transplanted, 31% died, 5% were removed for recovery and 2% remained waiting. Of patients transplanted, 37% had clinical deterioration between listing and transplant. Of 18 patients on VAD support, 8 survived to transplant. No significant risk factors were associated with clinical deterioration on the waitlist. Use of total parenteral nutrition and not receiving any enteral nutrition were both significantly associated with waitlist mortality. S1 and S2 patients have high clinical disease severity at the time of listing, and over half of them progressively worsen while awaiting transplant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41247544What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.