ReviewIntensive care medicine2026
Bedside thoracic echography in ICU: new insights for acute circulatory and respiratory failure.
Review in Intensive care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Point-of-care ultrasound in hemodynamically unstable pulmonary embolism.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Review
- Lung ultrasound for predicting surfactant administration in ventilated and non-ventilated infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a multicenter prospective study.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Observational
- Usefulness of Bedside Point-of-care Ultrasounds in Intensive Care Unit for Septic Patients: A Consensus Statement of the Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging.Journal of cardiovascular echographyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In intensive care, hemodynamic and respiratory failure are the two main types of organ failure and are frequently associated. In cases of shock and/or acute dyspnea, thoracic ultrasound involves the simultaneous use of lung ultrasound and transthoracic echocardiography. While rigorous clinical assessment remains fundamental, the current literature shows that adding thoracic ultrasound to conventional examination improves diagnostic accuracy and enables rapid, adequate therapeutic decisions during shock and/or acute respiratory failure in a non-invasive way. However, its impact on survival is still being debated. This narrative review summarizes the criteria that help identify the five main hemodynamic profiles during shock, as well as the endpoints that allow discrimination between cardiogenic pulmonary edema, acute respiratory distress syndrome, pneumonia, pleural effusion and pneumothorax. It also proposes pragmatic algorithms for managing shock and/or respiratory failure at the bedside. Current data suggest that artificial intelligence and automated measurements will greatly improve the diagnostic performance, reproducibility, ease of use, and teachability of thoracic ultrasound in the near future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41247499What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.