Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41247483›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026

Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy as an Effective Treatment for Late Sigmoid Neovagina Prolapse with Colonic Polyps.

Albert Ayumba, Masayoshi Nomura, Tokumasa Hayashi

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Albert AyumbaDepartment of Urogynecology, Kameda Medical Centre, Chiba, Japan. ayumbaalb@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2522-3804
Masayoshi NomuraDepartment of Urogynecology, Kameda Medical Centre, Chiba, Japan.
Tokumasa HayashiDepartment of Urogynecology, Kameda Medical Centre, Chiba, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several case report publications of sigmoid neo vagina prolapse highlight the techniques and challenges of both primary and recurrence repairs. The various prolapse surgery repair approaches include mesh and nonmesh sacrocolpopexy, paravaginal repair, and mesh and nonmesh sacrospinous ligament fixation, among others. A combination of techniques with a multidisciplinary input where feasible can help to overcome any difficulties. Although there exists no consensus on the most effective repair technique, mesh sacrocolpopexy is commonly applied and has the best nonrecurrence rates. Possible factors that may contribute to recurrence after primary repair include functional elongation of the neovagina during sexual activity and the need to spare the vascular pedicle during prolapse repair surgery. We therefore illustrate a laparoscopic mesh repair approach to reconstructing a late sigmoid neovagina prolapse after sigmoid colon vaginoplasty.

Indexed as

Colonic PolypsColon, SigmoidGynecologic Surgical ProceduresLaparoscopyUterine ProlapseVaginaFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSurgical MeshLaparoscopic sacrocolpopexyNeovagina prolapseSigmoid neovagina

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.