ArticleBiochemical genetics2026
Urinary DNA Methylation Profiling Improves Discrimination of Prostate Cancer Across PSA-Defined Risk Strata.
Article in Biochemical genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing lacks specificity due to benign conditions. This study assessed whether integrating DNA methylation signatures with PSA metrics improves discrimination of prostate cancer (PCa) from non-PCa cases. Targeted bisulfite sequencing of 74 CpG sites in 9 genes was performed on urine sediment from 194 patients (89 PCa, 105 non-PCa). Patients were stratified by total PSA (tPSA) and free-to-total PSA ratio (%fPSA) into risk groups. Random forest identified discriminatory methylation markers, and support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), and Bayesian models were constructed and validated. PSA-based stratification alone could not reliably distinguish PCa from non-PCa, with 26.80% of patients falling into a diagnostic "gray zone". Twenty CpG sites showed significant differential methylation (p < 0.01). In addition, several CpG loci exhibited methylation differences across PSA risk groups. Models based on random forest-selected markers achieved strong diagnostic performance, with KNN yielding the highest accuracy (AUC > 0.95, 100% specificity), and consistently high sensitivity (> 80%), maintaining strong discriminative power even in PSA "gray-zone" cases. Urine-based DNA methylation profiling enhances the diagnostic accuracy of PCa beyond PSA testing, particularly in cases within the PSA gray zone. Validation in larger independent cohorts is warranted to establish its clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41247441What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.