ArticleSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society2025
Impact of coverage of drug availability regulations across the supply chain cycle in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is a need for assessing the impact of current drug availability regulations across the various stages of the pharmaceutical supply chain and among different stakeholders involved. This mixed methods survey assessed the impact of pharmaceutical availability regulations across the drug supply chain in Saudi Arabia. This research utilized a cross-sectional study design involving a survey conducted at a single point in time to collect data from key stakeholders across the various stages of the pharmaceutical supply chain. Various metrics, such as availability ratings, accessibility issues, and stakeholder perspectives on regulatory effectiveness were examined. Mixed methods analysis combined survey statistics with qualitative insights. The data source for this study comprised an online survey targeting key stakeholders involved along the pharmaceutical supply chain (n = 27), including drug manufacturers (n = 10), distributors (n = 4), and healthcare settings, such as hospitals (n = 9) and pharmacies (n = 4). The data were collected in September 2023. Manufacturers (mean availability rating of 3.8) and distributors (mean availability rating of 3.5) viewed regulations to be more effective versus hospital/pharmacies (mean availability rating of 3.3) citing lack of harmonization and transparency as key efficiency deterrents. Centralized inventory monitoring and unified availability benchmarks were strongly advocated as enhancements alongside improved communication flows. Ultimately, a collaborative, yet guided approach is imperative for balancing industrial priorities and access imperatives to attain synchrony across the pharmaceutical value chain in order to augment both health and economic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.