Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41247388›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2025

Associations between susceptibility to the rubber hand illusion and action reproduction accuracy.

Masanori Sakamoto, Yuki Matsuda

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Masanori SakamotoDivision of Health and Physical Education, Graduate School of Education, Kumamoto University, 2-40-1 Kurokami, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto City, 860-8555, Japan. sakamoto@educ.kumamoto-u.ac.jp.
Yuki MatsudaDepartment of Physical Education, Faculty of Education, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto City, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neural representation of the body is highly flexible and can be altered by integrating multisensory signals in the brain. The rubber hand illusion (RHI) is a widely used paradigm to investigate this phenomenon; participants experience ownership of a rubber hand and perceive their real hand as shifting toward the rubber hand's location, a phenomenon known as proprioceptive drift. Although individual differences in the extent of this drift are well documented, it remains unclear whether such differences are related to specific aspects of motor function. In this study, we examined the relationship between the magnitude of proprioceptive drift during the RHI and the ability of individuals to imitate and reproduce elbow movements. Our results revealed a significant correlation between the magnitude of proprioceptive drift and the accuracy of action reproduction but not imitation. These findings suggest that altered body representation may selectively influence the motor processes involved in action reproduction, highlighting the interplay between body ownership and motor control.

Indexed as

Body ImageHandIllusionsImitative BehaviorProprioceptionPsychomotor PerformanceTouch PerceptionVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleMovementYoung AdultAction reproductionBody schemaProprioceptive driftRubber hand illusion

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.