ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025
Deep Learning Algorithm Prognosticating Retinal Tears and Detachments From Optical Coherence Tomography.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Our image classifier prognosticates future retinal tear/retinal detachment (RT/RD) likelihood from optical coherence tomography (OCT) while providing pixel-level explanations of clinical importance. Methods: RT/RD status (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision codes) and surgical status (Current Procedural Terminology codes) were determined for OCTs collected from the Stanford Research Repository. An image positive for future RT/RD-related surgery was defined as no RT/RD or surgery prior to the acquisition date and the acquisition date 90 days prior to RT/RD diagnosis or surgery. A negative image had no patient overlap with the positive class, had no RT/RD or surgery indication at any time, and was positive for plaquenil use without toxic maculopathy. A convolutional neural network, Inception-v4, was fine-tuned in a class-stratified fivefold fashion on the data set containing 433 negative patients (1027 images) and 343 positive patients (1027 images). Each fold contained a separate patient cohort. Heatmaps indicating a model's region of focus were generated using gradient-weighted class activation mapping to verify that the model's intuition was consistent with clinical knowledge. Results: Performance metrics were collected by averaging across folds. For the test set, the model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.87, an average precision score of 0.85, and an accuracy of 0.78. Anatomy highlighted in heatmaps described macular biomarkers for RT/RD, including epiretinal membrane presence, vitreomacular traction, degree of myopic tilt, and choroidal thickness. Conclusions: The binary image classifier accurately identified future RT/RD development from OCTs. Translational Relevance: Our deep learning algorithm highlights biomarkers for patients at high risk for RT/RDs, providing a window for prophylactic treatment to prevent vision loss. .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.