Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41247114›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025

Differentiating Ocular Pathogenic Staphylococcus epidermidis Isolates Using a Human Corneal Epithelial Cell Coculture Model.

Qiankun Chen, Yuan Wei, Jinding Pang, Zhenyu Wei, Yan Peng, Ahyan Ilman Qudsi, Zijun Zhang, Xinxin Lu, Zhiqun Wang, Yang Zhang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Qiankun ChenBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yuan WeiBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jinding PangBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhenyu WeiBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yan PengBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Beijing, China.
Ahyan Ilman QudsiBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zijun ZhangBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xinxin LuBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhiqun WangBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yang ZhangBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Beijing, China.
Kexin ChenBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Beijing, China.
Qingfeng LiangBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To develop an in vitro human corneal epithelial cell (HCEC) coculture model for differentiating pathogenic from nonpathogenic ocular Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates. Methods: HCECs were cocultured with S. epidermidis strains (104-108 CFU/mL) for 12 to 72 hours. Cell viability was assessed using calcein AM staining. Seventeen strains were evaluated in this model and validated in mouse keratitis models. Cytotoxicity profiles of pathogenic versus nonpathogenic strains were compared, and receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to evaluate HCEC viability as a predictor of pathogenicity. Results: A 24-hour HCEC coculture assay reliably quantified bacterial cytotoxicity across concentrations. In vivo, 12 of 17 strains (70.6%) were pathogenic in mouse keratitis models. In vitro, cytotoxicity was detected in 50.0% of pathogenic strains (6/12) at 104 CFU/mL, 58.3% (7/12) at 105 CFU/mL, and 83.3% (10/12) at 106 CFU/mL, whereas no nonpathogenic strains induced cytotoxicity at ≤106 CFU/mL. At 106 CFU/mL, HCEC viability was significantly lower with pathogenic than nonpathogenic strains (P = 0.006). Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified a 91.36% viability cutoff at 106 CFU/mL of S. epidermidis to distinguish pathogenic strains, yielding an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.9167, with 100% specificity and 91.7% sensitivity. Conclusions: This HCEC coculture assay provides a rapid and reliable method to distinguish pathogenic from nonpathogenic S. epidermidis ocular isolates, with strong concordance with in vivo keratitis outcomes. Translational Relevance: This model offers a practical diagnostic tool to identify clinically relevant S. epidermidis strains, supporting earlier and more accurate diagnosis of bacterial keratitis and guiding targeted therapy.

Indexed as

Coculture TechniquesEpithelium, CornealEye Infections, BacterialKeratitisStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus epidermidisAnimalsCell SurvivalDisease Models, AnimalEpithelial CellsFemaleHumansMiceMice, Inbred C57BL

Identifiers

PMID41247114
PMCPMC12633770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.