Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41247099›Full record

ReviewPsychiatry and clinical psychopharmacology2025

Rethinking Catatonia in Neurodevelopmental Conditions: Toward a Refined Typology and Research Framework.

Kerim M Munir

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychiatry and clinical psychopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Frozen emotions, frozen bodies: a systematic review of limbic system alterations in catatonia.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kerim M MunirDevelopmental Medicine Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2404-1806

Funding

NCD-LIFESPAN Global Mental Health/Developmental Disorders Research Training InitiD43TW009680 · FIC · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI MUNIR, KERIM M · 2014 to 2018
$1.3M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Catatonia is a transdiagnostic syndrome observed across psychiatric, medical, and developmental disorders. In the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR), it is not classified as a stand-alone disorder but as a specifier or syndrome that accompanies other conditions. This review examines the current state of knowledge on catatonia in children, adolescents, and individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders, particularly autism spectrum disorder and intellectual developmental disorders. Several DSM-5-TR criteria overlap with baseline behaviors in these populations, creating a risk of false-positive diagnoses. To improve specificity, a refined framework that requires at least 2 of 5 core signs-stupor/immobility, new-onset mutism, posturing or catalepsy with waxy flexibility, severe negativism or withdrawal, and stimulusindependent excitement/agitation-each demonstrably new or worsened from baseline is proposed. The Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale and its Pediatric Catatonia Rating Scale adaptation is reviewed, highlighting their limitations in developmental contexts. Catatonia typologies relevant to neurodevelopmental conditions are also outlined, the cautious use of the lorazepam challenge test is discussed, and converging neurobiological evidence implicating gamma-aminobutyric acid, glutamate, dopamine, cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical circuitry, and immune mechanisms is summarized. Future directions include psychometric validation of pediatric tools, empirical item reduction, integration of biomarkers, and treatment prediction studies to refine developmental assessment and clinical care.

Identifiers

PMID41247099
PMCPMC12633481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.