ArticleInfectious Disease Modelling2026
Understanding human mobility patterns under a public health emergency.
Article in Infectious Disease Modelling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dynamics of a two-patch epidemic model with deterministic/stochastic migration and distributed delays.Infectious Disease Modelling · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Understanding human mobility changes during epidemics is critical for predicting disease spread and planning interventions. However, capturing fine-scale dynamics is challenging. Methods: This study analyzed high-resolution human mobility patterns in Shanghai, China, during the 2022 SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 outbreak using large-scale anonymized cellular signaling data. We investigated mobility shifts across five distinct epidemic phases (pre-outbreak, targeted interventions, citywide lockdown, targeted lifting, and reopening) stratified by age, sex, and travel purpose. A comprehensive evaluation of four gravity and four radiation spatial interaction models was conducted to assess their ability to explain the observed mobility patterns under varying demographic and behavioral conditions. Results: Population size and distance were found to be primary drivers of mobility, with notable variations across demographic groups and travel purposes. During the lockdown, mobility significantly decreased, particularly for social-related trips and the working-age population, while the effect of distance was substantially higher. Although mobility volumes recovered post-lockdown, a larger effect of distance persisted, implying long-lasting behavioral changes. Our comparative analysis showed that while several variants of gravity and radiation models captured overall patterns effectively, their performance was context-dependent, varying significantly across epidemic phases, population subgroups, and travel purposes. Conclusion: These findings highlight the importance of integrating different mobility models to capture the complex human mobility picture by different population groups during an epidemic outbreak. Overall, this study advances our understanding of behavioral adaptations during crises, enhancing preparedness and response planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.