ArticleCureus2025
Palliative Radiotherapy for Dysphagia in Esophageal Cancer: Short-Term Benefits and Late Toxicity Risks.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Esophageal cancer is often diagnosed at an advanced stage, with dysphagia being the most common and distressing symptom that significantly impairs quality of life (QOL). Palliative radiotherapy is frequently used to relieve dysphagia, but its benefits and risks remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate short-term dysphagia improvement and treatment-related toxicities in patients with esophageal cancer receiving palliative radiotherapy. Materials and methods We retrospectively analyzed 58 patients with esophageal cancer and dysphagia treated with palliative radiotherapy (30-40 Gy in 10-20 fractions) between April 2016 and March 2024. Of these, four patients (7%) received radiotherapy alone, while the remaining 54 (93%) underwent concurrent chemotherapy. Dysphagia scores were assessed before radiotherapy and one month after. Overall survival (OS) and treatment-related toxicities were also evaluated. Results Following radiotherapy, 45 of 58 patients (78%) experienced improvement in dysphagia, with a median time to symptom relief of 35 days. Among these 45 patients, recurrent dysphagia occurred in 17 (38%), with a median time from improvement to recurrence of 4.3 months (interquartile range (IQR), 2.2 to 6.0 months) and a median survival of 1.2 months after recurrence (IQR, 0.6 to 2.0 months). Across all patients, those who received concurrent chemotherapy tended to have higher rates of dysphagia improvement, suggesting that combination treatment may further alleviate esophageal obstruction. In patients with T3 disease or earlier, palliative radiotherapy was generally safe, and symptom relief contributed to improved oral intake and potential QOL benefits. In contrast, patients with T4b disease had a high incidence of late grade 2 to 3 esophageal or bronchial fistulas (36%), significantly more frequent than in T3 cases (6.7%). Acute toxicities were generally mild, but the risk of serious late adverse events in advanced disease highlights the need for careful patient selection. Conclusion Palliative radiotherapy can improve short-term dysphagia in most patients with esophageal cancer; however, patients with T4b disease face a higher risk of serious late adverse events, necessitating careful selection. While symptom relief may temporarily improve QOL, clinicians should weigh these risks carefully and discuss them with patients before proceeding. Patients should be counseled not only about the potential for short-term symptom relief but also about the risks of dysphagia recurrence and serious late adverse events to support shared decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.