Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41246765›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Dental Panoramic Radiographs as Opportunistic Screening for Carotid Calcifications: A Case-Based Review.

Guido Schiroli, Pierluigi Valente, Francesco Valente, Lapo Sbrenna, Andrea Sbrenna

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Guido SchiroliDentistry, University of Genoa, Genoa, ITA.
Pierluigi ValenteDentistry, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, ITA.
Francesco ValenteOral Implantology, San Damiano Dental Clinic, Rome, ITA.
Lapo SbrennaDentistry, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, ITA.
Andrea SbrennaPrivate Practice, Humanis Dental Center, Perugia, ITA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidental detection of carotid artery calcifications on routine panoramic radiographs highlights the preventive role of dentists in identifying patients at cardiovascular risk. This case-based review describes the unexpected finding of unilateral radiopaque masses at the level of the cervical vertebrae C3-C4 on the right side of a panoramic radiograph, consistent with carotid artery calcifications. Such findings are clinically significant due to their possible association with cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events, including stroke and myocardial infarction. Although panoramic radiographs are not designed as screening tools for vascular disease, they may incidentally reveal calcifications in the carotid region, offering a unique opportunity for early recognition and timely medical referral. Emerging evidence suggests that the prevalence of these incidental findings is not negligible, reinforcing the need for increased awareness among dental professionals. While advanced imaging modalities are more accurate in detecting early vascular changes, panoramic radiographs are routinely performed in dental practice, making them a valuable tool for opportunistic detection. This case highlights the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration, where dentists play a pivotal role in the early identification of systemic conditions beyond the oral cavity, potentially reducing the risk of adverse vascular outcomes.

Indexed as

carotid artery calcificationcarotid artery doppler ultrasounddental panoramic calcificationdental panoramic radiographdental x raysincidental findings dental panoramic

Identifiers

PMID41246765
PMCPMC12614913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.