ArticleCureus2025
Effectiveness of the One-Minute Paper as a Continuous Internal Assessment Tool for Learners and Teachers.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background An assessment tool is necessary to help medical students adequately grasp their learning and to allow them to ask, discuss, and answer questions about the material being taught. The One-Minute Paper (OMP) is a rapid and effective formative assessment tool used in educational settings to enhance learning and teaching. The present interventional study aims to assess the effectiveness of the OMP as a continuous assessment tool for teachers and learners and to investigate the perceptions of learners and faculty regarding OMP as a continuous internal assessment tool. Methodology This prospective, interventional study, based on online questionnaire feedback, was conducted at Dhubri Medical College and Hospital (DMCH), Dhubri, from February 2024 to July 2024. The study participants were Phase 2 MBBS students from DMCH, Dhubri, Assam. A sample of 100 students was selected using a convenience sampling method. Google Forms was created with questions or prompts related to the content covered in the class or lesson, and the link was shared with learners at the end of the session, instructing them to complete the form within one minute. Descriptive statistical methods were used to analyze the data. Results Of the 100 Phase II MBBS students who participated in the study, 83-90 participants in the five lectures provided complete responses on all components of the OMP questionnaire. In total, 425 completed replies were gathered from the five groups, among whom 253 (59.5%) rated the sessions as highly useful. An average of 97.4% (n = 414/425) reported that all learning goals covered in class were clearly described. Additionally, 97.6% (n = 415/425) reported that the provided topics were useful and improved their learning. Participants sought greater explanations of laboratory testing methods. Overall, 45.0% (n = 191) of participants appreciated the excellent performance of OMP, while another 32.0% (n = 136) marked it as a successful initiative. Conclusions Most participants believed that the OMP is a suitable technique for assessing lessons learnt in lectures. The OMP was useful for assessing the utility of the concepts taught and providing educators with information on the efficacy of their teaching strategies. Input from previous sessions helped them identify knowledge gaps and refine their procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.