Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41246735›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Effectiveness of the One-Minute Paper as a Continuous Internal Assessment Tool for Learners and Teachers.

Dina Raja, Harekrishna Nath, Rika Engtipi, Nishanta Thakuria, Devyashree Medhi, Divya Daimari, Adarshlata Singh, Putul Mahanta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dina RajaMicrobiology, Dhubri Medical College and Hospital, Dhubri, IND.
Harekrishna NathMicrobiology, Dhubri Medical College and Hospital, Dhubri, IND.
Rika EngtipiMicrobiology, Dhubri Medical College and Hospital, Dhubri, IND.
Nishanta ThakuriaPharmacology and Therapeutics, Dhubri Medical College and Hospital, Dhubri, IND.
Devyashree MedhiMicrobiology, Dhubri Medical College and Hospital, Dhubri, IND.
Divya DaimariMicrobiology, Dhubri Medical College and Hospital, Dhubri, IND.
Adarshlata SinghDermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Putul MahantaForensic Medicine and Toxicology, Nalbari Medical College, Nalbari, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background An assessment tool is necessary to help medical students adequately grasp their learning and to allow them to ask, discuss, and answer questions about the material being taught. The One-Minute Paper (OMP) is a rapid and effective formative assessment tool used in educational settings to enhance learning and teaching. The present interventional study aims to assess the effectiveness of the OMP as a continuous assessment tool for teachers and learners and to investigate the perceptions of learners and faculty regarding OMP as a continuous internal assessment tool. Methodology This prospective, interventional study, based on online questionnaire feedback, was conducted at Dhubri Medical College and Hospital (DMCH), Dhubri, from February 2024 to July 2024. The study participants were Phase 2 MBBS students from DMCH, Dhubri, Assam. A sample of 100 students was selected using a convenience sampling method. Google Forms was created with questions or prompts related to the content covered in the class or lesson, and the link was shared with learners at the end of the session, instructing them to complete the form within one minute. Descriptive statistical methods were used to analyze the data. Results Of the 100 Phase II MBBS students who participated in the study, 83-90 participants in the five lectures provided complete responses on all components of the OMP questionnaire. In total, 425 completed replies were gathered from the five groups, among whom 253 (59.5%) rated the sessions as highly useful. An average of 97.4% (n = 414/425) reported that all learning goals covered in class were clearly described. Additionally, 97.6% (n = 415/425) reported that the provided topics were useful and improved their learning. Participants sought greater explanations of laboratory testing methods. Overall, 45.0% (n = 191) of participants appreciated the excellent performance of OMP, while another 32.0% (n = 136) marked it as a successful initiative. Conclusions Most participants believed that the OMP is a suitable technique for assessing lessons learnt in lectures. The OMP was useful for assessing the utility of the concepts taught and providing educators with information on the efficacy of their teaching strategies. Input from previous sessions helped them identify knowledge gaps and refine their procedures.

Indexed as

competency-based medical educationformative assessmentnational medical commissionone-minute paperstudent learning

Identifiers

PMID41246735
PMCPMC12619686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.