Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41246654›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Comparison of Cold-Cup Biopsy Versus Resection Biopsy in the Early Detection of Detrusor Muscle Invasion in the Case of Bladder Tumor.

Saifullah Khan, Faiza Hayat, Qudratullah Wazir, Sania Gul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Saifullah KhanDepartment of Urology, Institute of Kidney Diseases Peshawar, Peshawar, PAK.
Faiza HayatDepartment of Urology, Institute of Kidney Diseases Peshawar, Peshawar, PAK.
Qudratullah WazirDepartment of Urology, Institute of Kidney Diseases Peshawar, Peshawar, PAK.
Sania GulArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare, Intelligent Information Processing Lab, National Centre of Artificial Intelligence, NED University of Engineering and Technology (UET), Peshawar, PAK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bladder cancer continues to represent a major global health burden, and accurate early staging is crucial for planning an appropriate treatment strategy regarding the presence of detrusor muscle (DM) invasion. This is a prospective observational study, conducted at the Institute of Kidney Diseases, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, from January to December 2024, to compare the diagnostic performance of cold-cup biopsy (CCB) over resection biopsy for the early diagnosis of histologically proven DM invasion. Consecutive non-probability sampling was used to enroll 104 patients (52 per group) aged ≥18 years with suspected bladder tumors. Preoperative workup consisted of cystoscopy, imaging, and documentation of the tumor. Methods included CCBs and resectional biopsies. The patients in both groups have comparable demographics and clinical characteristics. The former technique employed targeted mechanical samplings done at the base of the tumor, while the latter used loop excision. The specimens were reviewed by histopathologists blinded to the presence or absence of DM and invasion. The results suggest that although there is no difference in the diagnostic accuracy for muscle invasion of the two methods, the CCB technique provides better DM retrieval (86.5% vs. 65.4%; p = 0.013) and tissue adequacy, which could decrease the rate of re-intervention.

Indexed as

bladder cancercold-cup biopsydetrusor muscle invasionresection biopsytransurethral resection of bladder tumor (turbt)

Identifiers

PMID41246654
PMCPMC12614874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.