ArticleCureus2025
Examining the Effect of Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction on Accelerating Shoulder Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Its Impact on Image Quality.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Prolonged scan time remains the main obstacle to increasing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) throughput. The advent of artificial intelligence brings forth opportunities to accelerate MRI examinations. Purpose This study compares the image quality of standard MRI versus accelerated MRI with deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLR) for shoulder MRI studies. Materials and methods Forty-nine subjects were prospectively enrolled and underwent both standard and accelerated axial proton density fat-saturated (PD FS) shoulder MRIs using a 1.5T scanner (Philips Ingenia 1.5T). Two blinded musculoskeletal radiologists independently evaluated paired datasets to assess the anatomic conspicuity of specific structures (labrum, rotator cuff footprint, cartilage, long head of the biceps tendon/rotator interval), artifacts, and overall image quality. A 5-point scale was employed, where 1 indicated the standard MRI was markedly superior and 5 indicated the accelerated MRI was markedly superior. The reduction in scan time was recorded; inter-reader variability was also analyzed. Results The DLR protocol reduced scan duration by 20.2% on average, shortening acquisition time from 184 seconds to 148 seconds. Mean scores for anatomic conspicuity ranged from 3.0 to 3.2, and mean scores for artifacts and overall image quality were 3.0 and 3.2, respectively. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test revealed statistically significant differences (p<0.001) for most categories, except for "Artifacts" as assessed by one reader. Inter-reader agreement was poor, with Cohen's kappa ranging from 0.086 to 0.183 and prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) scores ranging from 0.063 to 0.404. Conclusion DLR-based acceleration significantly reduces scan time while maintaining diagnostic image quality, presenting a clinically feasible and efficient solution for routine shoulder MRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.