ArticleCureus2025
Late Presentation of a Perforated Marginal Ulcer Three Years After Mini Gastric Bypass: A Rare Entity.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Marginal ulcers (MUs) are an uncommon complication following one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). They are often managed conservatively, but in some cases, they can progress to perforation. Such ulcer-related perforations are particularly rare and usually occur early in the postoperative period. We report the case of a middle-aged woman who presented with sudden, severe abdominal pain several years after undergoing OAGB. She had no identifiable active risk factors. Abdominal X-ray showed free air under the diaphragm, and computed tomography (CT) scan demonstrated extraluminal air and contrast near the gastrojejunostomy, findings interpreted as suspicious for perforation at the anastomotic site. Diagnostic laparoscopy confirmed a perforated marginal ulcer (PMU) at the anastomotic site, with the anastomosis itself remaining intact. The diagnosis was made intraoperatively based on visual inspection, revealing an ulcer at the anastomotic site with an apex measuring approximately 1.5 cm. No biopsy was obtained, as the ulcer margins appeared benign with no evidence of ischemia or malignancy. The defect was repaired with a laparoscopic Graham's patch and omentopexy. The patient recovered well and returned to normal activity shortly after discharge. This case is notable for its delayed presentation, progression of a marginal ulcer to perforation at the gastrojejunal anastomosis, and the absence of additional modifiable risk factors apart from the inherent risk associated with the anastomosis itself. It underscores the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for late complications in post-bariatric patients and shows that timely minimally invasive surgery can achieve excellent outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.