ArticleCureus2025
Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes Among Women With Recurrent Spontaneous Abortions: An Observational Study From a Tertiary Care Hospital in South India.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Risk factors associated with birth asphyxia at Pumwani Maternity Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya: a case-control study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) is a significant reproductive health concern associated with adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes in subsequent pregnancies. However, evidence from Indian tertiary care settings remains limited.
objectivesTo study patterns of obstetric and neonatal outcomes among women with prior spontaneous abortions and to examine whether the risk of adverse outcomes increases with the number of previous losses.
methodsThis hospital-based observational study was conducted at a tertiary care center in South India from January 2024 to March 2025. Ninety-five pregnant women with ≥2 previous spontaneous abortions (miscarriages) were enrolled consecutively and followed prospectively. Of these, 88 pregnancies completed follow-up and were included in the final analysis. Participants were stratified into two groups: two prior spontaneous abortions (n = 72) and three or more (n = 23). Data were collected using a pre-tested semi-structured questionnaire. Outcomes included mode of delivery, gestational age, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), birth weight, Apgar scores, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and neonatal complications. Low birth weight was defined as <2.5 kg, and low Apgar score as <7 at one minute. Associations were tested using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests, with effect sizes expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
resultsAmong the 95 pregnancies enrolled, 88 had known outcomes: 81 live births and seven spontaneous abortions, while seven women remained under antenatal follow-up at study completion. Women with three or more prior spontaneous abortions had higher odds of cesarean delivery (OR = 2.8; 95% CI = 1.1-7.5), recurrent loss (OR = 6.3; 95% CI = 1.1-36.1), and preterm birth (OR = 4.0; 95% CI = 1.1-14.2) compared with those with two losses. Neonates born to these women had higher odds of low birth weight (<2.5 kg; OR = 5.1; 95% CI = 1.1-23.1) and low Apgar scores (<7 at one minute; OR = 9.9; 95% CI = 1.0-96.7). Although NICU admissions and neonatal complications were more frequent in this group, the differences were not statistically significant. Given the modest subgroup size (n = 23 for ≥3 losses), these findings should be interpreted as exploratory.
conclusionWomen with recurrent spontaneous abortions, particularly those with three or more losses, experience higher odds of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes. The results suggest a possible dose-response pattern, underscoring the need for early risk stratification, preconception counseling, and intensified antenatal surveillance in this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.