Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41246585›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Perinephric Hematoma Following Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: A Comprehensive Review of Four Decades of Evidence on Risk Factors, Prevention, and Management.

Ahmed Abdelrasheed, Muhammad Iqbal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ahmed AbdelrasheedUrology, Royal Glamorgan Hospital, Pontyclun, GBR.
Muhammad IqbalUrology, Cwm Taf University Health Board, Royal Glamorgan Hospital Llantrisant, Cardiff, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perinephric hematoma represents a significant complication following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), with reported incidence ranging from 0.1% to 30% depending on detection methodology. This comprehensive review examines four decades of evidence since the first clinical ESWL treatment in 1980, analyzing risk factors, prevention strategies, and management approaches. Following a systematic literature search, we identified 36 relevant studies encompassing 30,347 treated patients. Hypertension emerges as the dominant modifiable risk factor, increasing hematoma rates from a baseline of 0.66% to 3.8% in poorly controlled patients. Stepwise voltage ramping protocols demonstrate remarkable protective effects, reducing incidence by over 50%. Conservative management succeeds in over 95% of cases, with arterial embolization reserved for active bleeding. Paradoxically, the original Dornier HM3 lithotripter maintains superior safety profiles compared to modern devices despite technological advances. Long-term follow-up studies document complete renal function preservation following appropriate management. These findings inform evidence-based protocols optimizing safety while maintaining treatment efficacy.

Indexed as

eswl complicationsextracorporeal shock wave lithotripsykidney stonesperinephric hematomarenal hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID41246585
PMCPMC12616209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.