ReviewFrontiers in urology2025
Focal therapy in prostate cancer and advances in the use of androgen blockade.
Review in Frontiers in urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Versus Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Oncologic and Functional Outcomes.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer: State of the Art, Physical Principles, Potentials, and Challenges.Cancers · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Focal therapy (FT) for localized prostate cancer (PCa) has evolved into a precision-based alternative to radical treatments, aiming to eradicate clinically significant disease while minimizing functional morbidity. This review provides an updated and critical synthesis of the current landscape of FT, emphasizing the central role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and fusion biopsy in patient selection, treatment planning, and post-therapy evaluation. mpMRI enables accurate lesion characterization, identification of index lesions, and tailored ablation with energy sources such as high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), cryotherapy, irreversible electroporation (IRE), vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy (VTP), and interstitial laser therapy (ILT). Across modalities, continence preservation exceeds 90%, and erectile function is maintained in up to 100% of patients, underscoring the functional safety of FT. While current evidence supports FT as an oncologically sound option for low- and select intermediate-risk disease, data from phase III trials remain scarce. Emerging strategies integrating androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with FT show promise in enhancing tumor control, particularly in high-risk, large-volume, or anatomically complex cases. Preliminary studies suggest synergistic benefits without increasing toxicity, though definitive long-term evidence is lacking. This review highlights how the convergence of advanced imaging, ablative technology, and systemic modulation may redefine the therapeutic paradigm of localized PCa. Further prospective, comparative trials are essential to establish the optimal combination strategies, refine patient selection, and confirm durable oncological and functional outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.