Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41246485›Full record

ReviewNanophotonics (Berlin, Germany)2025

Machine-learning-assisted photonic device development: a multiscale approach from theory to characterization.

Yuheng Chen, Alexander Montes McNeil, Taehyuk Park, Blake A Wilson, Vaishnavi Iyer, Michael Bezick, Jae-Ik Choi, Rohan Ojha, Pravin Mahendran, Daksh Kumar Singh and 9 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Yuheng ChenElmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Birck Nanotechnology Center, and Purdue Quantum Science and Engineering Institute, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2896-6831
Alexander Montes McNeilDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5893-228X
Taehyuk ParkSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Blake A WilsonElmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Birck Nanotechnology Center, and Purdue Quantum Science and Engineering Institute, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Vaishnavi IyerElmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Birck Nanotechnology Center, and Purdue Quantum Science and Engineering Institute, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Michael BezickElmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Birck Nanotechnology Center, and Purdue Quantum Science and Engineering Institute, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Jae-Ik ChoiElmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Birck Nanotechnology Center, and Purdue Quantum Science and Engineering Institute, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Rohan OjhaElmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Birck Nanotechnology Center, and Purdue Quantum Science and Engineering Institute, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Pravin MahendranElmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Birck Nanotechnology Center, and Purdue Quantum Science and Engineering Institute, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Daksh Kumar SinghElmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Birck Nanotechnology Center, and Purdue Quantum Science and Engineering Institute, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Geetika ChitturiElmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Birck Nanotechnology Center, and Purdue Quantum Science and Engineering Institute, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Peigang ChenElmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Birck Nanotechnology Center, and Purdue Quantum Science and Engineering Institute, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Trang DoElmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Birck Nanotechnology Center, and Purdue Quantum Science and Engineering Institute, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Alexander V KildishevElmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Birck Nanotechnology Center, and Purdue Quantum Science and Engineering Institute, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Vladimir M ShalaevElmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Birck Nanotechnology Center, and Purdue Quantum Science and Engineering Institute, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Michael MoebiusThe Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Wenshan CaiSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Yongmin LiuDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Alexandra BoltassevaElmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Birck Nanotechnology Center, and Purdue Quantum Science and Engineering Institute, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8905-2605

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photonic device development (PDD) has achieved remarkable success in designing and implementing new devices for controlling light across various wavelengths, scales, and applications, including telecommunications, imaging, sensing, and quantum information processing. PDD is an iterative, five-step process that consists of: (i) deriving device behavior from design parameters, (ii) simulating device performance, (iii) finding the optimal candidate designs from simulations, (iv) fabricating the optimal device, and (v) measuring device performance. Classically, all these steps involve Bayesian optimization, material science, control theory, and direct physics-driven numerical methods. However, many of these techniques are computationally intractable, monetarily costly, or difficult to implement at scale. In addition, PDD suffers from large optimization landscapes, uncertainties in structural or optical characterization, and difficulties in implementing robust fabrication processes. However, the advent of machine learning over the past decade has provided novel, data-driven strategies for tackling these challenges, including surrogate estimators for speeding up computations, generative modeling for noisy measurement modeling and data augmentation, reinforcement learning for fabrication, and active learning for experimental physical discovery. In this review, we present a comprehensive perspective on these methods to enable machine-learning-assisted PDD (ML-PDD) for efficient design optimization with powerful generative models, fast simulation and characterization modeling under noisy measurements, and reinforcement learning for fabrication. This review will provide researchers from diverse backgrounds with valuable insights into this emerging topic, fostering interdisciplinary efforts to accelerate the development of complex photonic devices and systems.

Indexed as

inverse designmachine learningnanophotonics

Identifiers

PMID41246485
PMCPMC12617836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.