ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2025
Large deletions in the
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the only treatment to eradicate inhibitors in people with severe hemophilia A (SHA). Successful ITI restores factor VIII (FVIII) tolerance. ITI is demanding and successful in approximately 70% of people. Objectives: Identifying predictors of ITI outcome is essential to guide clinical decision making. We aimed to identify genetic predictors of ITI success in people with SHA and inhibitors who underwent ITI. Methods: This observational multicenter study included people with SHA who underwent ITI, between 2015 and 2023. Clinical and patient data, including FVIII gene ( Results: Of 204 participants, 147 (72.1%) achieved ITI success. The majority (52.0%) of participants had Conclusion: Our study of 204 people with SHA identified
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.