ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2026
Cost Effectiveness of Hand Postaxial Polydactyly Type B Excision in the Office Versus Operating Room.
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Postaxial polydactyly type B of the hand can be excised in the office with local anesthesia or in the operating room under general anesthesia. Existing studies have not described the cost difference between these treatments. We compared charges, reimbursements, and outcomes of office and operating room excision. Methods: All cases of postaxial polydactyly type B excision at a children's hospital from fiscal year 2018-2023 were included. Independent Results: Of 620 total patients, 30 (4.8%) underwent operating room excisions (22 bilateral and 8 unilateral), and 590 (95%) had office excisions (346 bilateral and 244 unilateral). Average total charges were 78% and 84% less for bilateral and unilateral excisions, respectively, in the office than in the operating room. Insurance companies paid $7800 more for bilateral operating room excisions and $7600 more for unilateral operating room excisions. Surgeons received $2300 more for bilateral operating room excisions and $1300 more for unilateral operating room excisions. The treatment strategy did not impact outcomes. Conclusions: Given the cost efficacy and safety of office excision, operating room excision should be limited to patient-specific factors requiring general anesthesia. Type of study/level of evidence: Prognosis IIb.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.