ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Clinical validation and machine learning optimization of MyCog: A self-administered cognitive screener for primary care settings.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical validation and machine learning optimization of MyCog: A self-administered cognitive screener for primary care settings.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Primary care offers ideal opportunities for early detection of cognitive impairment, yet clinics face significant barriers to routine screening. MyCog is an electronic health record-integrated tablet application self-administered during a primary care visit designed to overcome barriers to screening. Methods: We compared MyCog performance between 65 adults age 65+ with diagnosed cognitive impairment and 80 cognitively normal adults. Five modeling approaches achieved consensus to select consistently discriminative variables for the final detection algorithm. Performance was primarily assessed via receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Results: All models demonstrated strong diagnostic performance (AUC 0.817 to 0.873). Memory accuracy and executive function efficiency scores were consistently selected as predictors of impairment across models. The final logistic regression achieved AUC 0.890, with sensitivity 0.723 to 0.831, specificity 0.788 to 0.912, and accuracy 0.807 to 0.828 depending on threshold. Discussion: Findings suggest MyCog accurately detects cognitive impairment via a streamlined self-administered app that efficiently fits into primary care workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.