Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41246322›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2025

Inflammatory markers from routine blood tests predict survival in multiple myeloma: a Systematic Review and meta-analysis.

Mengjiao Luo, Ling Qin, Yujie Li, Qianru Mei, Qiaoping Wu, Xudong Feng

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mengjiao Luo *Department of Clinical Laboratory, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, The Affiliated Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Ling Qin *Department of Clinical Laboratory, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, The Affiliated Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Yujie LiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, The Affiliated Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Qianru MeiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, The Affiliated Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Qiaoping WuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, The Affiliated Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Xudong FengDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, The Affiliated Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable hematologic malignancy marked by abnormal plasma cell proliferation. Inflammatory indices derived from routine blood tests-such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), red cell distribution width (RDW), RDW-to-platelet ratio (RPR), and hemoglobin-to-RDW ratio (HRR)-have shown prognostic value across cancers. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate their prognostic significance in MM. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science identified eligible studies through January 17, 2025. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were conducted to assess heterogeneity, and publication bias was evaluated using Egger's and Begg's tests. Results: Twenty-seven studies including 5,009 MM patients were analyzed. Elevated NLR was significantly associated with poor overall survival (OS: HR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.72-2.47) and progression-free survival (PFS: HR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.32-2.19), as well as advanced disease stage (OR = 2.85, 95% CI: 1.40-5.80). High RDW and low LMR were similarly linked to worse outcomes (RDW-OS: HR = 1.68; LMR-OS: HR = 0.58). PLR showed no significant association with prognosis. RPR and HRR results were inconsistent due to limited data. Conclusion: NLR, LMR, and RDW are promising prognostic biomarkers in MM, with elevated NLR and RDW and decreased LMR indicating poorer outcomes. PLR, RPR, and HRR require further investigation. These routinely accessible indices may aid in clinical risk stratification and therapeutic decision-making. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251105106, identifier CRD420251105106.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorInflammationMultiple MyelomaErythrocyte IndicesHematologic TestsHumansNeutrophilsPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorLMRmultiple myelomaNLRprognosisRDW

Identifiers

PMID41246322
PMCPMC12611959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.