ReviewPalliative care and social practice2025
Exploring and understanding different perspectives on the experience of engaging with death doulas and those in activity-aligned roles toward the end of life: An integrative review.
Review in Palliative care and social practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The death doula movement is expanding due to dissatisfaction with the medicalization of death and dying. Existing reviews focus on exploring and defining the death doula's role in providing care. However, the experiences of death doulas or those performing aligned activities for the dying person, families, and healthcare professionals have not been synthesized. Objective: To explore the experiences of engaging with death doulas and those performing aligned activities from multiple perspectives (including the dying person, their families, health and social care professionals, and death doulas or those in activity-aligned roles themselves). Design: A systematically constructed integrative review. Data sources and methods: Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, and Lens.org (searched September 2024) for concepts related to death doula and palliative care. Inclusion criteria: discussion of death doula or aligned activities; dying persons, families, doulas, or healthcare workers' experiences with death doulas; any study type; any year; in English. Exclusion criteria: birthing, labor, or maternal doulas/midwives. Non-human death, life-limiting illnesses in people who are not in the end-of-life phase, or healthcare professionals or social workers, reviews, protocols, and abstracts. Papers were coded iteratively and synthesized into final themes. Quality appraisal was done using Mixed Method Appraisal Tool scoring. Results: Papers ( Conclusion: The limited evidence from literature, including experiential perspectives outside of reports from death doulas or those in aligned-activities roles, indicates that research should continue to explore the benefits of adding these roles to end-of-life care. Positive experiences of engaging a doula or with those performing aligned activities appear related to role flexibility, which seems to facilitate other favorable experiences. However, flexibility also seems to be a cause of role confusion and boundary issues, shedding light on the need to develop regulation that protects both death doulas or those performing similar activities and those they engage with. Open Science registration: Https://osf.io/jkmsd.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.