Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41246263›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Prevalence, distribution and antimicrobial resistance profiles in poultry meat samples from India: a systematic review.

V Pooja Sajish, Nazim Uzzaman, Niroshini Aramvalarthan, Muhammad Asaduzzaman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. A spotlight on multidrug-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

V Pooja SajishUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Nazim UzzamanUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Niroshini AramvalarthanUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Muhammad AsaduzzamanDepartment of Community Medicine and Global Health, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Chicken meat is a widely consumed source of protein in India but increasing reports of bacterial contamination and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) raise significant public health concerns. This systematic review aims to assess the prevalence of key bacterial pathogens in chicken meat across India and their resistance profiles. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was carried out across PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases for studies published up to August 2024. Additionally, gray literature was retrieved using Google Scholar. Studies that identified bacterial isolates from chicken meat samples in India and reported antimicrobial susceptibility results were selected for inclusion. Data were extracted on bacterial species, sample location, antibiotics tested, and resistance rates using Microsoft Excel. A heatmap and summary tables were generated to visualize resistance trends. Results: A total of 32 studies were included in this review, with Conclusion: The widespread presence of multidrug-resistant bacteria in Indian chicken meat underscores the urgent need for robust surveillance, regulatory action on antibiotic use in poultry, and adoption of a One Health approach to mitigate AMR transmission.

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistancechicken meatEscherichia coliIndiamultidrug resistanceone healthSalmonella

Identifiers

PMID41246263
PMCPMC12616860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.