Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41246236›Full record

ReviewTurkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi2025

Applications of transfer learning in sunflower disease detection: advances, challenges, and future directions.

Yonis Gulzar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yonis GulzarDepartment of Management Information Systems, College of Business Administration, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6515-1569

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/aim: Sunflower ( Materials and methods: A structured Scopus query was employed to retrieve peer-reviewed articles published between 2021 and 2025. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria ensured technical relevance to TL-based sunflower disease detection. Subsequently, 30 studies meeting the criteria were critically reviewed and analyzed in terms of model architecture, dataset characteristics, preprocessing strategies, and reported evaluation metrics. The comparative assessment focused on convolutional neural networks (CNNs), transformer-based architectures, and hybrid models. Results: The analysis revealed a dominant reliance on pretrained CNNs such as ResNet, VGG, Inception, and EfficientNet. Several studies employed lightweight or federated learning variants to enhance deployment feasibility under field conditions. Among the commonly observed challenges were limited dataset diversity, class imbalance, and insufficient explainability. A key word cooccurrence analysis indicated an evolving research focus, transitioning from basic deep learning implementation to explainable and privacy-preserving frameworks optimized for edge devices. Conclusion: The review revealed substantial progress in TL applications for the diagnosis of sunflower disease but underscored the need for larger, standardized datasets and cross-regional validation. Future studies should prioritize interpretable, adaptive architectures that can function in real-world agricultural environments. The insights drawn from this synthesis extend beyond sunflower pathology, offering a foundation for scalable, domain-transferable TL solutions in broader plant disease detection contexts.

Indexed as

convolutional neural networksexplainable artificial intelligencefederated learninglightweight modelsSunflower disease detectiontransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID41246236
PMCPMC12614360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.