ReviewTurkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi2025
A review of deep learning architectures for plant disease detection.
Review in Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rose leaf disease classification and severity estimation using an interpretable vision transformer-based multi-task framework.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- A comparative analysis of single- and dual-backbone deep learning architectures with explainable AI for cherry leaf disease classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- AgriFusionNet: a context-aware multimodal leaf disease diagnosis and classification system for sustainable plant health monitoring.Frontiers in fungal biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/aim: The rapid advancement of deep learning (DL) has revolutionized plant disease detection by enabling highly accurate, image-based diagnostic solutions. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of DL-based methodologies for plant disease detection, systematically structured around the key stages of the modeling pipeline, encompassing data acquisition, preprocessing, augmentation, classification, detection, segmentation, and deployment. Materials and methods: The review focuses on evaluating convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures such as VGG, ResNet, EfficientNet, and DenseNet across diverse experimental contexts. Classification strategies are categorized according to their integration of visualization techniques (e.g., saliency maps, Grad-CAM) to enhance model interpretability, emphasizing the pivotal role of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in plant pathology. Object detection models are systematically examined within both one-stage (YOLO, SSD) and two-stage (Faster R-CNN) paradigms. Furthermore, critical challenges-such as environmental variability, data imbalance, and computational constraints-along with potential solutions including transfer learning, synthetic data generation using generative adversarial networks (GANs) and diffusion models, and edge computing for real-time deployment, are comprehensively discussed. Results: This review summarizes best practices for dataset selection and model optimization for mobile platforms, emphasizing their role in improving the efficiency and accuracy of plant disease detection systems. Conclusion: Deep learning-based methods show strong potential to enhance precision and resilience in real-world plant disease detection and monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.