Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41246228›Full record

ReviewTurkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi2025

A systematic review of machine learning in heart disease prediction.

Tathagat Banerjee, İshak Paçal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tathagat BanerjeeDepartment of Computer Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Patna, Bihar, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7410-3633
İshak PaçalDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Igdir University, Iğdır, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6670-2169

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/aim: Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are a leading cause of global mortality, prompting the need for advanced predictive tools. While machine learning (ML) offers a powerful solution, there are significant challenges to clinical translation. This systematic review synthesizes the current state of ML in heart disease prediction, evaluating algorithmic performance, data utilization, and key translational challenges. Materials and methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of literature published up to 2025 was conducted. From an initial pool of over 2500 records, a rigorous screening process yielded 65 studies for in-depth qualitative synthesis. Results: Analysis showed that ensemble learning models dominate prediction tasks on structured data, achieving high accuracy on benchmarks. Deep learning (DL) is increasingly applied to unstructured data like electrocardiogram signals and cardiac imaging. Despite high performance reported in models, a significant translational gap exists. This is driven by a pervasive lack of external validation, an overreliance on limited public datasets, and the black-box nature of complex models that reduces clinical trust. The adoption of explainable artificial intelligence is a key trend aimed at mitigating these challenges. Conclusion: While ML shows significant potential, its utility remains largely confined to academic settings. The future of the field depends on a fundamental research shift, rather than on incremental accuracy gains. Progress requires a concerted focus on robust external validation, the development of large-scale representative datasets, and the creation of interpretable systems that can be effectively integrated into clinical workflows to improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

deep learningexplainable artificial intelligenceHeart diseasemachine learningpredictive modeling

Identifiers

PMID41246228
PMCPMC12614364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.