ReviewTurkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi2025
A systematic review of machine learning in heart disease prediction.
Review in Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Unimodal to multimodal: a systematic review of predictive machine learning models for valvular heart diseases.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Multimodal oral cancer detection with embedding-level oversampling of fused image and clinical data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of Artificial Intelligence Prediction of Epicardial Coronary Artery Spasm in Patients Without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Federated generative prompt learning with vision foundation models: universal efficient multi-center medical image analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Leakage-Safe Precision-Aware Dual-Branch FT-Transformer for Population-Scale Heart Disease Risk Prediction.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Gastroenterological disease detection using transformer-based medical imaging for sustainable healthcare.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging: From Automated Acquisition to Precision Diagnostics and Clinical Decision Support.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Compact deep learning models for colon histopathology focusing performance and generalization challenges.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Dual vision transformer with bio-inspired optimization for explainable keratoconus classification.International ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Labour-type physical activity, metabolic dysregulation, and hypertension in rural older adults: rethinking work, exercise, and health in a cold-climate agricultural community.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting atrial fibrillation risk in middle-aged and older patients with coronary heart disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Machine learning models based on magnetic resonance imaging for predicting Lymphovascular Invasion in Invasive Breast Cancer.PloS one · 2026Article
- Interpretable ensemble learning for tumor-type prediction with a SHAP-based evaluation of CatBoost and voting classifiers.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A novel deep semantic- and vision-based self-attention architecture for skin cancer classification.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/aim: Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are a leading cause of global mortality, prompting the need for advanced predictive tools. While machine learning (ML) offers a powerful solution, there are significant challenges to clinical translation. This systematic review synthesizes the current state of ML in heart disease prediction, evaluating algorithmic performance, data utilization, and key translational challenges. Materials and methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of literature published up to 2025 was conducted. From an initial pool of over 2500 records, a rigorous screening process yielded 65 studies for in-depth qualitative synthesis. Results: Analysis showed that ensemble learning models dominate prediction tasks on structured data, achieving high accuracy on benchmarks. Deep learning (DL) is increasingly applied to unstructured data like electrocardiogram signals and cardiac imaging. Despite high performance reported in models, a significant translational gap exists. This is driven by a pervasive lack of external validation, an overreliance on limited public datasets, and the black-box nature of complex models that reduces clinical trust. The adoption of explainable artificial intelligence is a key trend aimed at mitigating these challenges. Conclusion: While ML shows significant potential, its utility remains largely confined to academic settings. The future of the field depends on a fundamental research shift, rather than on incremental accuracy gains. Progress requires a concerted focus on robust external validation, the development of large-scale representative datasets, and the creation of interpretable systems that can be effectively integrated into clinical workflows to improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.