Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41246222›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2025

Stellate ganglion block efficacy during electrical storm reproduced by hypnotic communication: a case report.

Marco Scaglione, Enrico Guido Spinoni, Veronica Dusi, Domenico Caponi, Gaetano Maria De Ferrari

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marco ScaglioneDivision of Cardiology, Cardinal Massaia Hospital, Corso Dante 202, Asti 14100, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7550-5463
Enrico Guido SpinoniDivision of Cardiology, Cardinal Massaia Hospital, Corso Dante 202, Asti 14100, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7980-1737
Veronica DusiDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Corso Mario Achille Dogliotti 41, Turin 10126, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2290-3126
Domenico CaponiDivision of Cardiology, Cardinal Massaia Hospital, Corso Dante 202, Asti 14100, Italy.
Gaetano Maria De FerrariDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Corso Mario Achille Dogliotti 41, Turin 10126, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4940-0876

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous stellate ganglion block (SGB) is being increasingly used to acutely manage electric storm (ES). No evidence in management of ES with hypnosis is available. Case summary: We report a case of a 73-year-old man with a severe dilatative cardiomyopathy and ES. Pharmacological therapy was titrated up to the highest tolerated dose (amiodarone, metoprolol, and lidocaine), with ES relapse after 1 week. Percutaneous SGB was effectively performed. Because of neck infection, the infusion catheter was removed and, in order to control arrhythmia relapse before surgical gangliectomy, hypnotic communication, mimicking SGB, was performed. No significant ventricular arrhythmia relapses were recorded for 3 days, when surgical gangliectomy was performed. Discussion: Hypnotic communication succeeded in reproducing the anti-arrhythmic effects of a percutaneous SGB. Hypnosis, when feasible, might represent a valuable technique for patients with ES.

Indexed as

Case reportElectrical stormHypnotic communicationPercutaneous stellate ganglion blockPharmacological treatmentSurgical gangliectomyVentricular arrhythmias

Identifiers

PMID41246222
PMCPMC12612669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.