ReviewDigital health
Reliability of artificial intelligence algorithms in automated age estimation using orthopantomograms: A scoping review.
Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aims to evaluate the efficiency of AI (artificial intelligence) algorithms for automated age estimation using orthopantomograms (OPGs) and to determine whether these models can effectively replace conventional age estimation techniques. Method: Three independent literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. Studies published in the English language were considered, focusing on age estimation using AI. A total of 1519 articles were screened, and 24 articles were included in the study. The data was extracted in a standardized, predefined manner. After finalizing the search, the data collected was tabulated, interpreted, and verified. The selected studies were analyzed for methodological rigor, algorithmic performance, and comparative effectiveness against traditional age estimation methods. Results: AI-based models, especially deep learning architectures like convolutional neural networks, EfficientNet, DenseNet, and hybrid models such as Age-Net, demonstrated superior accuracy, precision, and reliability compared to traditional age estimation methods. These AI-driven models show promising results in reducing human error, increasing efficiency, and enhancing forensic and clinical decision-making. Conclusion: AI-driven age estimation using OPGs represents a transformative advancement with considerable forensic and clinical potential. Although these AI models may not yet fully replace conventional techniques, they offer a substantial value as complementary tools, improving both accuracy and operational efficiency. To foster wider adoption and improve reliability, ongoing research and the development of standardized protocols are essential for integrating these methods into forensic odontology and related fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.