ArticleDigital health
Highly adaptable smartphone-based monitoring for patients with severe mental illness: Feasibility and usability study.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Severe mental illness (SMI) requires continuous treatment. Smartphone-based monitoring enables real-time data collection and offers a way of complementing clinical workflows by creating a bridge between patients and providers. Since their needs often differ, collaborative and highly adaptable tools are warranted. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of the highly adaptable remote-measurement-based care intervention Methods: Forty-nine patients were recruited for the 90-day trial and were provided with Recovery Cat a smartphone app designed to collaboratively set up and monitor clinical symptoms and functional parameters. Data were collected through daily self-reports. Feasibility was assessed by the dropout rate and user engagement, while user-friendliness was evaluated by the System Usability Scale (SUS). Results: 29 participants completed the study. The majority were single, unemployed, diagnosed with an affective disorder, had prior psychiatric treatment, and were in continuous outpatient psychiatric care. EMA data were available for 26 participants. 84.61% ( Conclusion: The results suggest that highly adaptable smartphone-based monitoring is feasible for patients with SMI. High adherence rates and positive usability scores indicate that this approach holds promise for enhancing mental health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.