Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41246190›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health research2025

Home working during the COVID-19 pandemic: The experience of drug and alcohol support workers.

Nigel Lloyd, Wendy Wills, Imogen Freethy, Olujoke Fakoya, Charis Bontoft, Jaime Garcia-Iglesias, Suzanne Bartington, Gavin Breslin, Neil Howlett, Julia Jones and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Nigel LloydSchool of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4218-1957
Wendy WillsCRIPACC, School of Health & Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7127-6045
Imogen FreethySchool of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, UK.
Olujoke FakoyaSchool of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, UK.
Charis BontoftSchool of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, UK.
Jaime Garcia-IglesiasSchool of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8841-5635
Suzanne BartingtonInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, UK.
Gavin BreslinBamford Centre for Mental Health and Wellbeing, Ulster University, UK.
Neil HowlettSchool of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6502-9969
Julia JonesCRIPACC, School of Health & Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3221-7362
Katie NewbySchool of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, UK.
Nigel SmeetonCRIPACC, School of Health & Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9460-5411
Amander WellingsCRIPACC, School of Health & Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, UK.
David WellstedSchool of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, UK.
Katherine BrownSchool of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Drug and alcohol support workers play a vital role in addressing the growing burden of substance-related harm and mortality. The COVID-19 pandemic led to an abrupt and significant shift towards home working for many in this workforce. This study explores these workers' home working experiences, addressing a research gap and providing valuable insights for staff, organisations delivering public health services, and service users. Design and methods: This qualitative study explores home working experiences of 30 drug and alcohol support workers in northern England during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data collection included innovative digital methods: (1) digital timelines ( Results: Seven themes were identified: (1) Difficulty balancing and separating work and home life; (2) Importance of setup, infrastructure and conducive work environment; (3) The move to remote/home working - a process; (4) Convenience and efficiency benefits; (5) Loss of the social: - reductions in social connectedness and feelings of isolation; (6) The importance of the 'office' for connection, communication, socialising, and information sharing; (7) Managing remotely - the development and implementation of strategies and ways of coping. Conclusions: While home working offers some benefits for substance use support workers, providers, and service users, it also introduces significant challenges. Understanding these is critical for service optimisation. A hybrid (in-person/remote) deliver model, combining home and co-located, office-based working may be optimal.

Indexed as

COVID-19 pandemicdrug and alcohol support serviceshome workingpublic healthremote workingsubstance useteleworkingwork from home

Identifiers

PMID41246190
PMCPMC12612507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.