ReviewFrontiers in allergy2025
Predictors of response to omalizumab and relapse in chronic spontaneous Urticaria: a narrative review focusing on parameters available in routine clinical practice.
Review in Frontiers in allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chronic Symptomatic Dermographism in a Young Atopic Adult With Fluctuating Serum IgE Levels and no Correlation to Disease Activity: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Treatment Approaches for Omalizumab-Refractory Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Thyroid autoantibodies predict long-term treatment response in euthyroid chronic spontaneous urticaria: a retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a heterogeneous disease with variable responses to treatment. Identifying predictors of response to omalizumab and relapse after its discontinuation is essential for optimizing management. This narrative review aims to summarize current evidence, emphasizing clinically accessible parameters to provide a practical guide for physicians in routine care settings. Response to omalizumab appears to be influenced by the underlying pathophysiological subtype of CSU. Type IIB autoimmune CSU, associated with lower total IgE levels, higher IgG anti-thyroid peroxidase levels, basopenia, eosinopenia, elevated C-reactive protein, and greater disease activity, correlates with poorer responses. Coexisting inducible urticaria is associated with the need for longer duration of omalizumab therapy. Patients with higher body mass index may be poor responders to omalizumab at licensed doses but may benefit from dose escalation. Predictors of relapse after discontinuation include high baseline disease activity, which may be related to type IIB autoimmune CSU, and longer disease duration. Achieving complete disease control prior to tapering omalizumab may also reduce the risk of recurrence. In conclusion, clinically accessible parameters can assist in predicting response to omalizumab and relapse risk. These indicators can support individualized treatment decisions and counseling in daily practice. Further research is needed to refine relapse predictors and validate strategies such as treatment optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.