Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41246116›Full record

ArticleUrban ecosystems2025

Future novel ecologies: exploring multispecies futures in urban places through a co-design workshop.

Mairéad O'Donnell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urban ecosystems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mairéad O'DonnellDiscipline of Botany, School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-9308-110X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transforming complex adaptive social-ecological systems, such as urban areas, requires collaboration with stakeholders to address multifaceted challenges. Co-design is a participatory decision-making process during which diverse knowledge and perspectives inform transformative solutions. As urban wilding gains momentum as a strategy for reimagining green space, co-design provides a way to collaboratively explore the values, conflicts, and possibilities that arise when planning for multispecies cohabitation. Urban wilding is an increasingly prominent approach to urban green space design, which emphasises the cohabitation of human and non-human species to foster biodiversity and ecological resilience. To integrate non-human perspectives into urban ecology practice, researchers from the participatory science project NovelEco developed the Future Novel Ecologies co-design workshop, which utilised multispecies methods to incorporate non-human perspectives into the design process. This paper outlines the workshop methodology for planning and conducting a workshop effectively, reflects on the workshop's effectiveness in fostering collaborative visioning, and suggests adaptations for implementation in alternative settings. Further, the integration of the workshop's methods into learning environments is discussed to reflect on how they can equip educators, students, and other stakeholders with tools that help reimagine urban ecologies. Insights are also provided about the value of municipalities, planning agencies, and local community groups adopting this workshop to enhance participatory planning and collaborative urban governance. This ecology-with-cities approach advances new inclusive, adaptive urban transformation frameworks by bridging participatory design and ecological, multispecies thinking. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11252-025-01846-9.

Indexed as

Co-designGreen spacesMultispeciesTransformationsUrban wildingWorkshops

Identifiers

PMID41246116
PMCPMC12612005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.